USPTO serial 74123022
SCHNITZEL SNACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 1992
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCHNITZEL SNACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palisades Park, NJ
Palisades Park, NJ
SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
OMAHA, NE
Other trademarks owned by SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
ALLEGAN, MI
Other trademarks owned by SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WAYNE L. LOVERCHECK
ROBERTA L CHRISTENSEN KOLEY JESSEN PC1 PACIFIC PL STE 800 1125 S 103 STOMAHA, NE 68124UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | pet food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPLE LEAF MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAPLE LEAF MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SERGEANT'S PET CARE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named SCHNITZEL SNACKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 7, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 1998 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 20, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |