USPTO serial 74123065
SMART-SINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART-SINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
JOSEPH W BERENATO III MYERS,ROSE & LINIAK6550 ROCK SPRING DRSTE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | wash stations for hand washing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |