USPTO serial 74123583
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROCKY MOUNTAIN DRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lesley S. Witt
LESLEY S WITT SHERIDAN, ROSS & MCINTOSHUNITED BANK CTR 35TH FL1700 LINCOLN STDENVER, CO 80203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |