Drawing for CHEMI-ZORB

USPTO serial 74123696

CHEMI-ZORB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHEMI-ZORB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADEL1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001preparations comprised of resins and activated charcoal used as a water filtering material for fresh and salt water aquariumsABANDONEDJul 1, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 1992ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 7, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 1, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 11, 1991IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 22, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance