Drawing for OIL BANK SYSTEM

USPTO serial 74123956

OIL BANK SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, MICHAEL J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OIL BANK SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Avis Frazier-Thomas

AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS DRUCKER & SOMMERS9465 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 328BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040providing waste oil recovery services featuring the collecting, reclaiming and reusing of waste oil from automobiles, trucks and other vehicles, as well as for industrial and commercial installationsABANDONEDSep 30, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 16, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 16, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance