Drawing for VISAGE BEAUTE

USPTO serial 74124056

VISAGE BEAUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISAGE BEAUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene L. Keogh

EUGENE L KEOGH REVLON, INC625 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics - namely, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, eye brow pencil, liquid foundation make-up, powder foundation make-up, face powder, face blusher, lipstick, lip liner, nail enamel, nail base coat, skin cleansing lotion, skin moisturizing gel, skin moisturizing lotion, skin cream and skin masqueABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 1994ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 30, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 30, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 1, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 3, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance