USPTO serial 74124092
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Timothy Hobbs
J TIMOTHY HOBBS MASON, FENWICK & LAWRENCESTE 10001225 EYE ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video tape recorders, and parts therefor; and accessories for video tape recorders; namely, video recorders with camera and video tape cassettes | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |