USPTO serial 74124660
NOBEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOBEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard P. Diana
LEONARD P DIANA FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO277 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10172UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | books utilized in veterinary and pet record keeping systems | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |