USPTO serial 74124668
SOILMEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1820431Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 1994
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOILMEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
47023 CESENA (FO), IT
47023 CESENA (FO), IT
47023 CESENA (FO), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC6500 CITY W PKWY STE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | drilling and excavating equipment; namely, dredgers, rotary drills and presses mounted on an excavator crane or truck, hydraulic buckets for deep-foundation walls and diaphragm excavations, electric and hydraulic vibrators for inserting and removing pilings, machines for pile driving, continuous helix excavating machines, machines for mechanical consolidation and mixing, machines for drilling and installing micropoles, injection machines, machines for gallery consolidation, machines for mixing and recuperating bentonitic or similar mixtures, machines for draining soil, pressure pumps for mud and concrete mixtures, drilling machines mounted on trucks for drilling water wells | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 20, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |