USPTO serial 74125186
FERREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FERREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pickering, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W.R. Langton
DAVID W R LANGTON ROGERS, BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401SCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |