USPTO serial 74125450
SUBSTANCES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUBSTANCES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
EDWARD M PRINCE CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMANNINTH FL1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toilet soaps; perfumery; essential oils for use as ingredients in the manufacture of perfumes, cosmetics and hygienic preparations; body hand cosmetic lotions and creams having an herbal base; toothpaste; and herb extracts used in the manufacture of cosmetics; namely, lotions and creams | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | herb extracts used in the manufacture of hygienic preparations and in veterinary products for the treatment of skin problems; veterinary medicines used for the treatment of skin problems; all purpose disinfectants; and fungicides for the extermination of vermin | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | teas; dry aromatic herbs for hot beverages; candy; and spices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |