USPTO serial 74125589
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
San Jose, CA
San Jose, CA
MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by MICROSYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
San Jose, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina Yablok
STE 2163000 SCOTT BLVDSANTA CLARA, CA 95054| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | intelligent ROM emulator in the computer industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 4, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |