Drawing for CITIZEN CITIZEN

USPTO serial 74125590

CITIZEN CITIZEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CITIZEN CITIZEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1111 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016stickers, labels and seals in the nature of adhesive stampsABANDONEDAug 10, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1995PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
Nov 14, 1995PRRGPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED—
Aug 29, 1995PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 1995PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Mar 3, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 25, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 1, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 22, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance