USPTO serial 74125590
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Citizen Tokei Kabushiki Kaisha
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Citizen Tokei Kabushiki Kaisha
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON SPENCER & FRANK1111 NINETEENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | stickers, labels and seals in the nature of adhesive stamps | ABANDONED | Aug 10, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1995 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1995 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |