USPTO serial 74127608
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald R. Fraser
DONALD R FRASER MARSHALL & MELHORNFOUR SEAGATE, EIGHTH FLTOLEDO, OH 43604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | providing cleaning and degreasing services including formulae and mixing specifications for biodegradable chemicals for use in institutional cleaning in restaurants, institutions, offices, schools, hotels, motels and other places of business | ABANDONED | Jan 12, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |