USPTO serial 74131252
DIMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 1995
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Blaine, WA
Campbell River, B.C., CA
Campbell River, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT B. REGEHR
HEBERT B REGEHR CANADA V6E3R3BULL, HOUSSER & TUPPER3000 ROYAL CTR 1055 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6E 3R3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | interdental immobilization apparatus used as an anchoring facility for the stabilization of the jaw | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |