USPTO serial 74133643
ASHWORTH & CLAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASHWORTH & CLAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU4 9DT, GB
Luton, Bedfordshire, LU4 9DT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen A. Hill
STEPHEN A HILL PEARNE, GORDON, MCCOY & GRANGER1200 LEADER BLDGCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume, toilet water; bath gel, shower gel, bath oil, bath salts, bubble bath; toilet soap; hair conditioners, hair shampoo; lip balm; hand lotion, skin moisturizer, skin cream, body lotion; talcum powder; toothpastes, dentifrices; mouthwashes; shaving cream, shaving gel, aftershave lotion; deodorants, antiperspirants; potpourri; perfumed and scented sachets, perfumed and scented wooden balls; perfumed and scented refresher oils for potpourri; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; nail care preparations, emery boards; shoe polish | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | soap dishes; ceramic containers having perforations for containing potpourri; potpourri steamers; toothbrushes; hair brushes, hair combs, body loofahs; shoe shine cloths, shoe shine mittens, shoe brushes; cosmetic brushes, cosmetic wipes; cotton wool balls | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GILCHRIST & SOAMES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GILCHRIST & SOAMES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ASHWORTH & CLAIRE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |