Drawing for MILWAUKEE BUCKS

USPTO serial 74135185

MILWAUKEE BUCKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILWAUKEE BUCKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa W. McRaney

MELISSA W MCRANEY PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys and sporting goods; namely, basketballs, golf balls, playground balls, sports balls, rubber action balls, foam balls, basketball nets, basketball backboards, basketball pumps, golf clubs, golf bags, computerized basketball table games, video game cartridges, basketball table top games, basketball board games, basketball tune-up kit comprising a basketball net, whistle, basketball pump and needle therefor, dolls, stuffed toys, jigsaw puzzles and Christmas tree ornamentsABANDONED—
041entertainment services; namely, organizing and conducting basketball games and exhibitionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 1994ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 17, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 1994EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Nov 5, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 1993PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 5, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 1992ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jun 7, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance