USPTO serial 74135185
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa W. McRaney
MELISSA W MCRANEY PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSOHN1585 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and sporting goods; namely, basketballs, golf balls, playground balls, sports balls, rubber action balls, foam balls, basketball nets, basketball backboards, basketball pumps, golf clubs, golf bags, computerized basketball table games, video game cartridges, basketball table top games, basketball board games, basketball tune-up kit comprising a basketball net, whistle, basketball pump and needle therefor, dolls, stuffed toys, jigsaw puzzles and Christmas tree ornaments | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | entertainment services; namely, organizing and conducting basketball games and exhibitions | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 1994 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 5, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 1992 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |