USPTO serial 74136075
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY A. NELSON
GREGORY A NELSON QUARLES & BRADYSTE 503515 N FLAGLER DRWEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-4323| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microprocessor-based data collection devices for monitoring labor, inventory, work in progress, quality assurance, and machines; and controllers and configuration software for collecting the data | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1991 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |