Drawing for CEILING PRO

USPTO serial 74139553

CEILING PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CEILING PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Willem F. Van Vliet

WILLEM F VAN VLIET VAN VLIET & HULL411 EDINA EXECUTIVE PLZ BLDG5200 WILSON RDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003industrial detergents used in connection with the cleaning of ceiling and ceiling materialsABANDONEDApr 17, 1989
037commercial ceiling cleaning servicesABANDONEDApr 17, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 11, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
May 18, 1992PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance