USPTO serial 74139553
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saint Louis Park, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Willem F. Van Vliet
WILLEM F VAN VLIET VAN VLIET & HULL411 EDINA EXECUTIVE PLZ BLDG5200 WILSON RDMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |