Drawing for COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

USPTO serial 74140814

COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1907951Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 1995
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George A. Garvey

GEORGE A GARVEY SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for the support of group communications, group decision making, group interactions, group knowledge, acquisition and recording, group knowledge data bases, group data analysis and group planning and manuals for use in connection therewithSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 10, 1992
035business management consulting services in the field of group communications, group decision making, group interactions, group knowledge acquisition and recording, group knowledge data bases, group data analysis and group planningSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 21, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2002C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 25, 1995R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Apr 19, 1994CNSRALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 19, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 1994CNSRALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 1994CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1992SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 19, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 14, 1992EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 1992EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 31, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance