USPTO serial 74152203
SSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Scheer
JAMES A SCHEER WELSH & KATZ, LTDSTE 1625135 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security and protection systems comprising anti-intrusion alarms, video monitors, motion sensors, status indicators, communications detectors, communications authorizers, and communications controllers | ABANDONED | Feb 21, 1995 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance, and repair of security and protection systems | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 1995 |
| 042 | research and development of new security and protection products for others; monitoring of and consultation in the field of security and protection systems | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sebrechts, Philippe
- Other trademarks owned by Sebrechts, Philippe
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SSS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |