USPTO serial 74157612
EYETECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYETECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Iowa City, IA
Iowa City, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Nemmers
JAMES C NEMMERS500 FIRSTAR BANK BLDGP O BOX 2107CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52406Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer input devices for controlling cursor movement on a computer display by movement of the head of the operator | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |