Drawing for COUNTER REVOLUTION

USPTO serial 74164611

COUNTER REVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COUNTER REVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert E. Lee, Jr.

ROBERT E LEE JR LEGAL DIVISION (PRC J3508)ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY2300 W PLANO PKWYPLANO, TX 75075

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035product merchandising display services for convenience stores; namely, designing sales counter displays to maximize impulse salesABANDONEDMay 1, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1992SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 17, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 14, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 20, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 13, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance