USPTO serial 74165194
FUN FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUN FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darsee R. Staley
DARSEE R STALEY LN POWELL SPEARS LUBERSKY800 PACIFIC BLDG520 S W YAMHILLPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepackaged children's foods and meals comprising, alone or in various combinations, meats, fish, poultry, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats, and preserves | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1991 |
| 030 | various combinations, sugar, rice, tapioca, flour, preparations made from processed and/or breakfast cereal; and bakery goods, candy; and honey, yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard, pepper, vinegar, sauces, and spices | ABANDONED | Sep 30, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1991 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Oct 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |