USPTO serial 74182144
SL SYSTEMS LIMITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, MICHAEL J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SL SYSTEMS LIMITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Rock, AR
Little Rock, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James Van Santen
JAMES VAN SANTEN HILL, VAN SANTEN, STEADMAN & SIMPSON70TH FL SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 1994 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |