Drawing for WASH DOWN DUTY

USPTO serial 74184144

WASH DOWN DUTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREBS, CATHERINE K.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WASH DOWN DUTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GERALD T. SHEKLETON

GERALD T SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric motorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 27, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 11, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 9, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 2, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 22, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 16, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance