Drawing for THE INNER CHILD

USPTO serial 74185046

THE INNER CHILD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE INNER CHILD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Malone

FLORENCE CAHN20 BLACKHEATH RDLIDO BEACH, NY 11561UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028dollsABANDONEDApr 18, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 1996PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED
Jan 25, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 24, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 13, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance