USPTO serial 74188587
MODAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MODAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Williamson
JOHN K WILLIAMSON WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATIONLAW DEPT - INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECT1310 BEULAH RD - CHURCHILL BOROPITTSBURGH, PA 15235Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | aviation radar having weather and wind shear detection capability | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1993 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |