Drawing for SV

USPTO serial 74188856

SV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Lee Burns, Jr.

G LEE BURNS JR FLYNN & STEWART100 FIRST ST STE 2100SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037real estate developmentABANDONED—
042plant and tree nurseryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 20, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 16, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance