USPTO serial 74200801
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1967560Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 16, 1996
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GROUP TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE HOLLAND & KNIGHT2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware in the fields of communications, communications security, and information security; electronic circuit cards; automatic test equipment for the measurement of performance of electronic circuit cards and computer software and hardware for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing; and computer software for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GROUP TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |