USPTO serial 74200809
GROUP TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1941915Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 1995
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GROUP TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H STABBE HOLLAND & KNIGHT2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | repair services for electronic circuit cards and computer hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 1989 |
| 040 | manufacture of electronic circuit cards, of automatic test equipment for the measurement of performance of electronic circuit cards for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing and of computer software and hardware for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 1989 |
| 042 | design of electronic circuit cards, of automatic test equipment for the measurement of performance of electronic circuit cards for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing and of computer software and hardware for communications, telecommunications between computer networks, communications security, information security, network security, teleconferencing and video teleconferencing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 30, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Group Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GROUP TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | PINT | REPRINTING REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1994 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |