USPTO serial 74208624
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Craig Armstrong
R CRAIG ARMSTRONG CARSON, ARMSTRONG285 FOUNTAIN ST SCAMBRIDGE, ON N3H 1J2CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising agency and public relations services | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation of audio, video and photographic equipment, including video and photographic cameras and recorders and audio reproduction equipment such as amplifiers, speakers and equalization devices | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | cellular communication equipment rentals, sales, installation and service | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | duplication of audio tapes, tape recordings, video cassettes, video tapes, motion picture films, and photographic images; and audio, video and film editing | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | audio-visual, video and photographic services; namely, videotape, motion picture and photo image production; audio recording and production; and rental of videotapes, videotape cassettes, and tape recording and photographic equipment | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail or whosale stores featuring; audio and video tapes; film, video and photographic cameras; projectors; production and editing equipment; and consultation in the field of audio, video and photographic equipment installation and use | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |