Drawing for DRIVE SAFELY

USPTO serial 74212578

DRIVE SAFELY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIVE SAFELY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William T. Boland

WILLIAM T BOLAND KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automobiles and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 8, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 1, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 26, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance