USPTO serial 74216749
PLUS DATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUS DATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Glendale Heights, IL
Glendale Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles A. Laff
CHARLES A LAFF LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 2000CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | distributorship services in the field of computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer software and other related computer products | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 19, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |