Drawing for BIOTECHNICAL COMPOSITES

USPTO serial 74217984

BIOTECHNICAL COMPOSITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1922932Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 1995
Examiner
HINES, CARYN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOTECHNICAL COMPOSITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald J. Bobak

DONALD J BOBAK RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, ET ALFIRST NATIONAL TWR 4TH FLAKRON, OH 44308-1456UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019geosynthetic components; namely, fibers, nettings, fabrics, mats, and meshes used for erosion controlEXPIREDSep 13, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 1, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 31, 2005C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 21, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 26, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 28, 1995CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 19, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 12, 1994CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 1, 1994SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 27, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 5, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 1994PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 13, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance