USPTO serial 74224472
CAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerome W. Pinderski, Jr.
JEROME W PINDERSKI JR PINDERSKI & PINDERSKI, LTD115 W COLFAXPALATINE, IL 60067-5086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | technical consultation, testing, research and engineering in the field of environmental processes | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 1975 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |