USPTO serial 74227991
UT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHO, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile fabrics made from artificial, synthetic or natural fibers or of combinations thereof for use in the manufacturing of clothing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 10, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |