Drawing for IRONMAN TRIATHLON

USPTO serial 74231297

IRONMAN TRIATHLON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IRONMAN TRIATHLON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William T. Rifkin

WILLIAM T RIFKIN RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014wristwatches and chronometers sold in association with contests consisting of running, biking and swimmingACTIVEJun 30, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 28, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 17, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance