USPTO serial 74238753
ONE MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VLCEK, TOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glen R. Grunewald
GLEN R GRUNEWALD166 SANTA CLARA AVEOAKLAND, CA 94610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 13, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |