USPTO serial 74241930
ENVIRONMENTAL TITLE INSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIRONMENTAL TITLE INSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S.D. McCarthy
S D MCCARTHY HOFFMANN, FISHER & HEINKE CO LPASTE 2850, 100 ERIEVIEW PLZCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | insurance brokerage in the field of protecting a purchaser of real estate from liability under 42 U.S.C. 9601, ET SEQ., and like statutes, which policy is issued upon appropriate inquiry conducted pursuant to "the manual for environmental title histories", the articulation of the trade secrets held by David C. Eisler and Wayne A. Weber, joint tenants, and physical examination of the real estate conducted pursuant thereto | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |