USPTO serial 74243286
VISUAL DIALTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUAL DIALTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathy A. Hackmann
KATHY A HACKMANN PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP130 KEARNY ST ROOM 3609SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communications services; namely, the electronic transmission of data; electronic mail; electronic voice messaging; namely, recording, storing and subsequently transmitting voice messages by telephone; gateway services; namely, providing access to information provided by others via telephone and providing access via a screen-based telephone to information of interest to the caller | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |