USPTO serial 74257480
EIDESIGN TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTER, SASHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EIDESIGN TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4141UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services; namely, conducting seminars and providing instruction in the fields of computers, computer software, data processors, facsimile machines, telex machines, calculators, and business technology | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | leasing of information and communication network computers; design of computer networks for others; design of semi-conductor circuit structures, ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), and memory devices for others; research and development of computers, computer software, data processors, facsimile machines, telex machines, and calculators for others; technical consulting and research in the fields of computers and computer technology; computer consultation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHIN NIPPON SEITETSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by SHIN NIPPON SEITETSU KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EIDESIGN TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |