Drawing for DIET EXPRESS

USPTO serial 74269411

DIET EXPRESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIET EXPRESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Dietrich

PAUL DIETRICH JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE1450 G ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2088UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016brochures and educational books featuring information on dietingABANDONED—
039food deliveryABANDONED—
042food preparation and weight reduction diet planning and supervisionABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Oct 14, 1994PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jun 10, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 11, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance