Drawing for TREDZ

USPTO serial 74270013

TREDZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1884430Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 1995
Examiner
LUPO, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TREDZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN P. MCNAMARA

STEPHEN P MCNAMARA RICHARDS & O'NEIL, LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4873UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing; namely, T-shirtsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 27, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 1995C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 15, 1995C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 14, 1995R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 23, 1994CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 21, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 10, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 10, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance