USPTO serial 74276154
MICROTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
British Columbia V5H 3Z7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester Rushin III
LESTER RUSHIN III GTE SERVICE CORPORATIONONE STAMFORD FORUMSTAMFORD, CT 06904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunication equipment; namely, transmission systems comprising; microwave radio transmitters, receivers and repeaters, video fiber optic transmitters, receivers and repeaters; frequency division multiplex units; coaxial cable carrier terminals and line repeaters; subscriber carrier frequency multiplexers; data modems, multiplexers and line repeaters; pulse code modulation channel banks and line repeaters; supervisory control systems for remote site status reporting, telemetering and telecontrol functions; echo suppressors and voice frequency and signalling units; central office systems comprising; telephone switching exchanges; private automatic branch exchanges; and station equipment comprising; telephone sets cord connectors, coin controller telephone sets, intercoms, and telephone answering machines; and telephone line testing instruments | ABANDONED | Oct 4, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |