Drawing for STAINED GLASS OVERLAY

USPTO serial 74278315

STAINED GLASS OVERLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAINED GLASS OVERLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Henry M. Bissell

Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019simulated stained glass windows, wall panels and hanging panels, both transparent, translucent, reflective, frosted and opaqueABANDONED—
035franchising services; namely, rendering aid and assistance in the establishment and/or operation of simulated stained and leaded glass panel processing outletsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 13, 1995NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Mar 11, 1995ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 17, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 7, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance