USPTO serial 74278827
SMART PLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 1994
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART PLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Wheeling, IL
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Wheeling, IL
VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Wheeling, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Shaftal
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PC77 W WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | electronic learning aids; namely, electronic educational games for the teaching of children; hand-held electronic games; electronic sound-making toys and games; electronic table-top games; electronic playsets for use with toy vehicles and figures; dolls; toy vehicles; electronic musical toys; and toy microphones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 19, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIDEO TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SMART PLAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |