USPTO serial 74290417
ELECTRIC PAGES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, RICHARD A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELECTRIC PAGES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester Rushin, III
LESTER RUSHIN III GTE SERVICE CORPORATIONONE STAMFORD FORUMSTAMFORD, CT 06904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | entertainment and educational services; namely, providing a computerized listing on home video movies, activities, theatres, concerts, clubs, and other recreational activities; providing a list of educational programs for adults and children, concerned with travel, personal development, the stock market, gardening, cooking and the like; and providing access to computerized educational interactive logic games | ABANDONED | Apr 4, 1983 |
| 038 | providing access to a telecommunication network via personal computers allowing a user to access information in the field of education | ABANDONED | Apr 4, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1993 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |