USPTO serial 74291848
NITE LITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1995
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NITE LITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Potomac, MD
North Potomac, MD
NITELITES FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
FRANKLIN, OH
North Potomac, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Beth Gettins
Mary Beth Gettins Gettins' Law2934 Portsmouth AvenueCincinnati, OH 45208United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation of electrical systems; namely, outdoor, low voltage lighting systems | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PERGANTIS, CONSTANTINE GEORGE
- Other trademarks owned by PERGANTIS, CONSTANTINE GEORGE
- Other trademarks owned by NITELITES FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PERGANTIS, CONSTANTINE GEORGE
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named NITE LITES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 16, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |