USPTO serial 74300591
CYBERTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1932437Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 1995
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CYBERTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH J PURCELL
2100 E GRAND AVEEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software in the fields of insurance and financial services, and associated instructional manuals therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cybertek Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cybertek Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Cybertek Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by MYND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CYBERTEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |